Individuals suffering from hair loss know how difficult the experience can be. That’s why hair transplant has become a common hair loss solution over the years. However, a more advanced technique called SMP has proven to offer better benefits than conventional hair transplant procedures. Find out how these two hair loss solutions compare against each other:
What is Hair Transplant?
Hair transplantation is a surgical technique that can fill an area with thin or no hair. The technique has been used since the 1950s and have undergone a myriad of changes. Oftentimes, the procedures involve cleaning the individual’s scalp and the injection of medicine to numb the back of his or her head. There are currently two methods for hair transplant: follicular unit extraction (FUE) and follicular unit strip surgery (FUSS).
Pros and Cons of Hair Transplant
- Since one’s own hair is used, the color of the ‘transplanted’ hair is the same as your original hair
- Complete recovery usually takes up to 10 months
- Hair transplants are natural and safe
- Hair transplants may come with significant costs; it depends on the amount of hair being moved
- Most insurance plans do not cover the payment for hair transplants
- Hair transplant may cause scarring and/or unnatural-looking new hair growth
- Some individuals may have inflammation or experience folliculitis (the infection of the hair follicles)
- There is an undesirable effect called shock loss (the loss of original hair in the area where one gets new strands)
What is SMP?
Scalp micropigmentation is a leading method of depositing tiny microscopic sterile and FDA-approved organic particles into an individual’s superficial epidermal layer of the scalp. Individuals opting for SMP treatment have nothing to worry about as no major pain is involved. The slight discomfort one may experience after the procedure disappears relatively quickly and beautiful result will start to emerge in no time. SMP can be used to restore receding hairlines, add density to thinning areas, and conceal the visibility of one’s scar.
Pros and Cons of SMP
- Completely safe as no chemicals are used
- Non-invasive procedure
- Highly affordable
- Simple procedure that can be completed in a short period of time
- Hassle-free and low maintenance
- Perfect for anyone who is satisfied with a simple look
- Produces realistic results from the get-go
- Rare fading (can be corrected without worries)
- Requires occasional shaving
- Limited hairstyles to choose from
The Bottom Line – SMP Is Better Than Hair Transplant
Hair transplantation can cause skin bumps when hair follicles die off to facilitate regrowth. During this time, an individual may experience discomfort of varying levels. SMP causes no pain from the get-go, which gave many individuals complete peace of mind. Hair transplant patients are exposed to the risk of developing stretch-back scars. SMP gradually increases the density of the treated area without causing similar side effects. It is evident that SMP is a better option than hair transplant. Find out for yourself if SMP is a suitable solution for your hair loss problem by booking an appointment with Jonathan Gerow SMP today.